A Los Angeles jury has found Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, and Google, the owner of YouTube, negligent in a case involving social media addiction. The jury awarded a 20-year-old woman, identified as KGM, a total of $6 million in damages, including $3 million in compensatory and $3 million in punitive damages [1][2].
The plaintiff, known as Kaley, testified that she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine. She claimed that her prolonged use of these platforms contributed to her depression, body dysmorphic disorder, anxiety, and self-harm [2]. The jury determined that the companies’ negligence was a ‘substantial factor’ in causing harm to the plaintiff and that they failed to adequately warn users of the potential dangers associated with their platforms [3].
The jury allocated 70% of the liability to Meta and 30% to Google, which was reflected in the division of both compensatory and punitive damages [2]. Both companies have expressed disagreement with the verdict and announced plans to appeal [1].

This verdict follows a separate ruling by a New Mexico jury, which ordered Meta to pay $375 million in civil penalties for allegedly harming children’s mental health and enabling child sexual exploitation, in violation of state law [1].
What Is Known
The Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google liable for negligence in designing their platforms, which contributed to the plaintiff’s addiction and mental health issues. The jury awarded $6 million in damages, with liability split between the two companies [1][2][3].
What Remains Unclear
It remains unclear how the appeals by Meta and Google will proceed and whether the verdict will influence future litigation related to social media addiction. Additionally, the specific changes, if any, that the companies might implement in response to the verdict are not yet known [1].
This article was generated by Bluxle's AI system based on research from multiple news sources. All facts are sourced and cited below. The AI is designed to be neutral and fact-based with no editorial opinion.
Sources & Citations
Weighted by citation frequency — sources cited more often carry greater influence.
Research Basis
Outlets in bold were actively consulted during research for this article. Others are in our standard monitoring pool.
Report an Issue
Tell us what you noticed. Our editors will review it.
✓ Report received. Thank you!