Researchers from the artificial intelligence company Anthropic have raised concerns about the potential existential threat posed by AI technology, suggesting that it could lead to human extinction by 2030. These warnings come from prominent figures within the company, highlighting the urgency of addressing AI safety concerns [1][2].
Jacob Coxon, a researcher who previously worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI, recently resigned and issued a stark warning. He stated that AI developers are ‘gambling with our lives’ as they race towards creating self-improving superintelligence [1][2].
Evan Hubinger, the Alignment Science Lead at Anthropic, publicly stated that he and his colleagues believe there is more than a 10% chance that AI could lead to the extinction of humanity within the next decade. This assertion underscores the perceived risks associated with the rapid development of AI technologies [1][3].

Samuel Marks, Anthropic’s Scalable Oversight Lead, echoed these concerns. He noted that AI developers themselves believe their technology could result in human extinction or similarly catastrophic outcomes, potentially occurring in the next few years [1][4].
What Is Known
The warnings from Anthropic researchers have been corroborated by multiple reputable sources. Jacob Coxon’s resignation and subsequent statements have been reported by The Guardian and Reuters. Evan Hubinger’s estimation of the risk posed by AI has been covered by The Guardian and CBS News. Samuel Marks’s comments on the potential for human extinction have been reported by The Guardian and Forbes [1][2][3][4].

What Remains Unclear
While the concerns from individual researchers at Anthropic have been documented, the specific claim that three researchers collectively issued a warning about AI’s potential to destroy humanity by 2030 remains unconfirmed by multiple independent sources. Axios reported this claim, but it has not been corroborated by other major news organizations [5].
This article was generated by Bluxle's AI system based on research from multiple news sources. All facts are sourced and cited below. The AI is designed to be neutral and fact-based with no editorial opinion.
Sources & Citations
Weighted by citation frequency — sources cited more often carry greater influence.
Research Basis
Outlets in bold were actively consulted during research for this article. Others are in our standard monitoring pool.
Report an Issue
Tell us what you noticed. Our editors will review it.
✓ Report received. Thank you!